Search for: "People v Long"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 19,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
In McMiller v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 5:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm
” That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:09 am
Courts will usually find a nine-month gap too long for retaliation cases. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:29 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in its 2016 U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 2:01 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:42 am
The key examples of the latter, of course, are Hammer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:59 pm
This is contrary to the very nature of a democracy, where people are supposed to hold their government to account. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
The history of Chinese Daily News is a long and torturous one that could only be of interest to those employment lawyers who are already familiar with that history or people who have run out of reading material at the doctor’s office. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm
Lazy Y [Ranch v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:28 am
” Lawson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
It could be based on race, religion, favorite sports team, people have the freedom to be with whom they love.I think this underlying theme is what our legal system will continue to struggle with when it comes to issues involving what is tantamount to enforcing a moral code, as discussed in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 9:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 9:06 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
On Tuesday, in People v Rawlins, 2008 NY Slip Op 01420, the Court of Appeals held, under the circumstances before them, that latent fingerprint comparison reports were testimonial statements, while DNA profile reports were not. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:11 am
That mistake continues to undermine the integrity of the Nation's judicial proceedings and deny the American people a liberty their predecessors long and justly considered inviolable. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm
After long proceedings at national level, a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on 16 December 2008 (Case C-73/07), and after the Court of Human Rights Chamber judgment of 21 July 2015, the Grand Chamber on 27 June 2017 finally found no violation of the right to freedom of expression and information in Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
” But his successful appeal was not long-lived. [read post]
Sorry, but your political enemies can use your copyrighted works (as long as their use is fair use).
9 Dec 2008, 9:37 am
Many people believe that an artist’s rights in her work include the right to prevent the use of the work on behalf of causes and beliefs she does not believe in. [read post]
