Search for: "Peters v. Doe"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 3,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am
Background: The Schrems II Decision and the End of Privacy Shield The executive order and accompanying DOJ regulations are intended to facilitate a new EU–U.S. data-transfer agreement, following the July 2020 decision by the CJEU in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
" (Waller v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:24 pm
In the landmark Miranda v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm
Peter Mankowski/Friederike Höffmann: “Scheidung ausländischer gleichgeschlechtlicher Ehen in Deutschland? [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm
USDA can be reluctant to act and when it does, often takes a measured response that many argue is inadequate. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Appeal from Johnson district court; PETER V. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm
People care less about money and more about credit than the law does. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Peter N. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
The most onerous sentences so far have been those meted out to former New York police officer Thomas Webster and welder Peter Schwartz—10 years and just over 14 years (170 months), respectively. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:43 am
Most noticeable there is the ongoing Costco v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Taylor (K.B. 1769); Donaldson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
(This is the classic nuisance case of Spur Industries v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
Second, show that it’s bad even though what the troll does in in strict compliance with the letter of the law. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
These processes and are currently being utilized on a grand scale by groups referred to as “copyright trolls” (“troll”).v Unlike the prototypical ‘content owners versus file sharer’ battle that has heretofore been pursued, this revived model brings a new third party to the bargaining table. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
Miles, III, spells out exactly how the Stored Communications Act could apply to employers requesting Facebook passwords: In Pietrylo v. [read post]
