Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 3,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2017, 4:17 am
Although 1709 Blog readers did not agree with this proposition, in his judgment in SAS v WPL, Arnold J [at para 27] held that: "In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Lash starts his compilation with the greatest hits of any conventional founding-era edited volume: the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:08 am
Beastie Boys v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 10:22 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
Today the Committee will have two sessions: in the first, at 2.40pm, the witnesses will be David Price QC, Gavin Millar QC, Keith Mathieson and Gillian Phillips; and in the second, at 3.40pm, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Gideon Benaim and Alasdair Pepper. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In Kilbourn v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm
(Phillips Chemical Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
Similarly, in the context of harm to national security, the courts have baulked at the inclusion of prior notification obligations in court orders, prefering to allow editors to assess for themselves the legal risk and to bear the responsibility for error of judgment (see, for example, Attorney General v Times Newspapers [2001] EWCA Civ 97, at [24]-[35], per Lord Phillips MR). [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:04 am
Dist. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
(a) Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b) Brand v NGN (c) Walliams v NGN. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
IPSO Rulings Satisfactory Remedy – 11792-22 Caves v thestar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 11834-22 Phillips v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – Sanction: publication of correction 11954-22 Lord v Rochdale Observer, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 5 Reporting suicide (2021), No breach – after investigation 13109-22 National LGBT+ Police Network v The Sunday… [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
(IWP) v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
Cooper v Turrell, heard 24 November 2011 (Tugendhat J) Phillips v NGN, heard 28 and 29 November 2011 (Judge LCJ, Neuberger MR, Kay V-P) Raab v Associated Newspapers Ltd., heard 9 December 2011 (Tugendhat J) Next week in Parliament 12 December 2011, 2:15 pm, Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Phillips Gold & Co., LLP v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
FindWhat Investor Group v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
