Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 3361 - 3380 of 14,161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
  However, although that might be persuasive, one also needs to read the claims in the context of the specification which might indicate otherwise. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:45 am by alysondrake
Despite doing well with her degree, she struggled to find work as a married, female, Asian-American attorney. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 1:52 pm
[Update: the state (by the Attorney General's office) filed a petition for review on August 14, 2006][Further update: the KSC granted review on December 19, 2006. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:26 am by Paul D. Knothe
 The Court noted that Attorney General opinions are not binding on the courts, and disagreed with the Attorney General’s analysis that the statute only confers peace officer status on custodial deputies while performing those duties. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm by Haley Proctor
In fact, the memorandum reflected deliberations on a different decision: what Attorney General Barr should communicate to Congress and to the public about his reading of the evidence in the Meuller Report. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Rather, all results can be explained by application of general principles of proximate cause. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 1:28 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
A group of 21 state attorneys general have sent a letter to the Senate majority and minority leaders as well as to the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee urging them to reject H.R. 3299 (“Protecting Consumers’ Access to Credit Act of 2017”) and H.R. 4439 (“Modernizing Credit Opportunities Act”). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:25 pm by Lee Tankle
Clouser, an Attorney in McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC’s Labor & Employment Practice Group in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:41 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  In my mind, this was as astonishing example of thoughtless, cookie-cutter justice at its worst.I recalled this incredibly unpleasant experience as I read the recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision of State v. [read post]