Search for: "Rolling v. State" Results 3361 - 3380 of 4,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm by Barry Sookman
The First Exploration Fund 1987 (1988), 25 B.C.L.R. (2d) 377 (S.C.); Rolling v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
The 9th District’s 2010 decision in State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:54 am by Administrator
But data retention carries with it a financial burden, an administrative nightmare and, most importantly, a shift in the balance between the citizen and the state that may be presumed to be irreversable: surveillance powers, once granted, are rarely rolled back. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:06 am
The UK Intellectual Property Office's alerting service has informed the IPKat of the case brought by Spain before the Court of Justice: Case C-274/11 Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
P.S: While reading S v Mamabolo again for this blog, I was struck by this comment by the Court, so apposite too to the Al-Bashir saga. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 1:11 pm by John Floyd
The police search the trash left outside the parents’ home, discovering marijuana and rolling papers. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:42 am
Currently seven states' courts have interpreted their consumer fraud statutes to require "reasonable reliance," and three-quarters of the states' courts impose this requirement for a common law action for fraud. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:53 am by crush
Blacksher spoke about the Constitutional implications of the Shelby Country v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:00 am by Adam Wagner
The judgment was not unanimous, however, with the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, dissenting. [read post]