Search for: "Rosen"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 5,396
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2012, 6:18 pm
As Jeffrey Rosen put it in his exchange with Randy, the Court could uphold the mandate and Congress would still be unable to regulate non-economic activity “where there are no collective action problems that make it impossible for the states to act on their own. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:44 pm
Rosen’s collective action limitation fares little better. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:46 am
Jennifer Granholm and Daniel Mulhern write for POLITICO, April 17, 2012 The Romneys had four household employees, but many American families are more likely to have four employers. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:01 am
But even if they do, there will still not be 5 votes for Rosen’s proposed limiting principles. [read post]
28 May 2012, 6:02 pm
Central) headline on the New Republic's web site for what I assume is a Jeffrey Rosen piece they're about to post ("tk" means "to come"): "tk rosen replies to his haters" [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:22 am
Concerning which, it is cheeky of Rosen, a liberal, to lecture Roberts about jurisprudential conservatism, which Rosen says requires “restraint,” meaning deference to congressional liberalism. [read post]
26 May 2012, 7:17 am
Jeffrey Rosen's usual propaganda was in The New Republic. [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:03 am
It was awesome re-connecting with friends I've known for decades at least a coupla years, presenting a combo ethics and social media session, and attending a rollicking "60 Websites in 60 Minutes for the Corporate Paralegal" session by Erik Mazzone, NCBA's Director of the Center for Practice Management, and Lee Rosen, a family lawyer and blogger at Divorce Discourse. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
According to one Superior Court of Massachusetts, it does not, advises Michael Rosen in Foley & Hoag's Massachusetts Non-Compete Blog. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:54 pm
Rubin and Parker’s columns made me wonder whether President Obama, Senator Leahy, and pundits like Jeff Rosen have now put Chief Justice John Roberts in the same position as FDR put Justice Owen Roberts. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:44 pm
This is a chapter in a book, Constitution 3.0: Freedom and Technological Change, edited by Jeffrey Rosen and Benjamin Wittes and published by Brookings. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:28 pm
This meme has most recently been taken up by Jeffrey Rosen, who claims that striking down the mandate would be “resurrecting the pre–New Deal era of economic judicial activism with a vengeance. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:27 am
Hence, the specific pressure on Chief Justice Roberts by Senataor Leahy and Jeff Rosen is implicitly urging him to change his vote from that which he cast in the conference.I think Randy is implying that the news of the vote leaked from the conference. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:03 am
Rosen et. al would have the chief justice sacrifice, perhaps permanently, the respect of his colleagues who know all too well the intimidation game afoot. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:23 am
(How you characterize Rosen is up to you, although it seems to me that by having more than one hat he ends up raising questions about all of them.) [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:00 am
Louis Rosen is a reference librarian and assistant professor of law library at Barry University School of Law in Orlando, Florida. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:00 am
Louis Rosen is a reference librarian and assistant professor of law library at Barry University School of Law in Orlando, Florida.Filed under: Book Reviews [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:06 am
The irony here is the sustained campaign by the President, Senator Leahy, and Left commentators like Jeff Rosen has now tainted as political any decision by Chief Justice Roberts to uphold the mandate, even if he did cast (or switch) his vote solely as a matter of legal principle. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:11 pm
I would be curious to hear Rosen’s explanation. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Rosen, M.D., "Continuing Bisphosphonate Treatment for Osteoporosis — For Whom and for How Long? [read post]
