Search for: "S. C." Results 3361 - 3380 of 142,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Katie Calogero and Daniel Alvarado
§ 3306(c)(1)(B) requires agencies to “include cost or price to the Federal Government as an evaluation factor that must be considered in the evaluation of proposals” for every procurement “except as provided in paragraph (3). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
The additional limitations on specific elements of compensation apply and can render a cost unallowable even if the total compensation is reasonable.[18] Third, the compensation must be based upon and consistent with “the terms and conditions of the contractor’s established compensation plan or practice followed so consistently as to imply, in effect, an agreement to make the payment. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
This passage appears to be a non-explicit reference to CJEU case law (Football Dataco, C-604/10, at [39]). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:18 am by Richard West
(n.d.). https://www.franklincountyauditor.com/real-estate/homestead[5] Attorney, C. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 10:06 am by Dennis Crouch
  The PTAB concluded that “[c]onsidered as an ordered combination, the computer components of Appellant’s claims add nothing that is not already present when the steps are considered separately. [read post]
Mayor Bowser signed the Minimum Wage Clarification Amendment Act of 2023 (B25-0134) (the “Amendment”), which modifies the circumstances under which an employee must be paid the District of Columbia’s minimum wage. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:54 am by The White Law Group
  Additionally, FINRA Rule 8210(c) mandates that no member or individual shall refuse to provide information or allow inspection and copying of books, records, or accounts as required by this rule. [read post]
The office said: [C]ontrary to defendants’ argument, there is a substantial risk that defendants will attempt to evade enforcement of the judgment (or make enforcement more difficult) following appeal. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Jacob Sapochnick
The Uniting for Ukraine program allows eligible Ukrainians to remain in the United States temporarily and apply for work authorization, due to the extraordinary circumstances caused by Russia’s invasion in 2022. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Unknown
N. c/ S., R. s/ filiación”, del 30 de mayo de 2014), especialmente en esta causa, por la índole de la materia debatida. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:02 am by Alessandro Cerri
The Court referred to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in PepsiCo Inc v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, C-281/10, which found that it is certainly permissible to use physical products in order to "confirm the conclusions already drawn" from the designs. [read post]
Further, to comply with the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) filing deadlines, those employers filing 1095-C forms electronically have until April 1, as paper filing has been mostly phased out. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:23 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
This mostly coincides with the CJEU’s case law, but fails to mention that such link shall be “direct and clear”. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
However, they are subject to New York law, and for this reason the claimants sought permission to rely on a report prepared by Marc C Rifkin, their New York attorney. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The first three were the “the use of financial inducements to generate referrals,”“schemes involving nursing homes,” and “protecting the Medicare Advantage Program, also known as Medicare Part C. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:53 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Marks’s letter cited the previous experience with Avastin’s withdrawal in determining that this was contrary to legislative intent. [read post]