Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL" Results 3361 - 3380 of 29,235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2022, 7:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Patentees raised concerns of harassment from multiple IPRs or IPRs followed by district court litigation. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am by Roger Parloff
The Indiana Election Commission will hear the challenge Friday, Feb. 18—one of 26 candidate challenges on its agenda that day—and the loser can appeal to the state court system.) [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 9:46 am by Shams Hirji and Alon Farahan
”  1292(b) grants appellate courts discretion to hear an order certified for interlocutory appeal by the district court if three elements are met: “(1) the order involves a controlling question of law; (2) an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate conclusion of the litigation; and (3) a substantial difference of opinion exists regarding the correctness of the decision. [read post]
Lieff Cabraser appealed, raising three challenges to the district court’s finding that it violated FRCP 11 by mispresenting the Study. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Adchem Corp., 271 F.3d 352 (2d Cir. 2001), the Court of Appeals upheld a $100,000 punitive damages award in a sexual harassment case. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
In other words, if Judge Rakoff was right that no reasonable juror could rule for Palin, then the appeals court will affirm on the ground that it doesn't really matter what the jury did or did not consider, as the case never should have gone to the jury in the first place.BUT . . . note that that second obstacle only comes into play in the course of the appeals court reviewing the JNOV. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 12:32 pm by Jenna Tersteegen
The Court of Appeals of the State of California, Second Appellate District, recently affirmed a trial court’s denial of a judgment creditor’s application for sale of the debtor’s dwelling to satisfy the creditor’s money judgment, finding the application was deficient. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Toshiba responded on January 31, 2022, arguing largely that the district court’s decision was primarily based upon findings of  fact, and not conclusions of law, and that under Ninth Circuit precedent interlocutory appeal  would be inappropriate in that circumstance. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:53 am by John L. Culhane, Jr.
  The district court granted summary judgment to MED-1 based on the bona fide error defense. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
The court surveys the 1591/1595 scienter ambiguity and says: The few district courts that have considered the issue in the four years since FOSTA’s enactment have reached different conclusions. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:17 am by Alex Moss
Uniloc appealed a second time, arguing that court records containing information about patent licenses are effectively exempt from the strong presumption of public access. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:31 am
Department of Justice’s civil rights division during the Obama administration; and 3rd District Court of Appeal Justice Elena J. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 7:00 am by Jenna Tersteegen
The Court of Appeals of the State of California, Second Appellate District, recently affirmed a trial court’s judgment holding that the limitation on recovery under the Federal Trade Commission’s “holder rule” does not preclude recovery of attorney fees, costs, nonstatutory costs, or prejudgment interest against the assignee. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 6:52 am by John Floyd
That false information was corroborated by a second HPD officer, Steven Bryant. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
”   We affirm as to the second cause of action, intentional interference with a contract. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 9:02 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Andrew Vaccaro
§ 626(f)(1)(H).The district court granted IBM’s motion to dismiss because it determined that the right to bring a collective action is not a substantive right protected by § 626(f)(1). [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 12:37 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
” The federal government has 60 days to appeal the court’s decision. [read post]