Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 4,538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 7:55 am
Ditto if your main judicial goal is overruling Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:47 am
v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm
In Ziglar v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
Because the Administration hopes to take shelter in a cryptic 1948 decision, Hirota v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
First, there is the quite stunning concurrence by three judges of the Texas State Court of Criminal Appeals, which explicitly adopts the concurring opinion of Justice Sevens in the Medellin v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
" [6] President Bush stated the bill "is large enough to have an impact, amounting to more than $152 billion this year, or about 1 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP). [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:24 pm
One need not even mention Bush v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
.), Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated, “I have concluded that this is a rare case where the proper course is to forgo defense of Section 5000(A)(a)” but that the decision not to defend the constitutionality of the individual mandate “will not prevent the court in Texas v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:44 am
Of course, we could echo Justice Scalia's words about Bush v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
The first arrived Tuesday morning, when the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg denied a request by Poland to reconsider its judgment in Al Nashiri & Abu Zubaydah v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, a few years ago in Arlington v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Thus, in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:01 am
agreeing with the Bush Administration. . . . [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
In famous cases like Bush v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Bush said. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:12 pm
John McCain wants to overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:02 pm
Bush administration. [read post]
