Search for: "Scales v. State" Results 3361 - 3380 of 4,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 10:26 am
v=-JL7Wrwj9dg; and https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/3F95E49183E6F8AF85257FD200505A3A/%24file/15-1063-1619173.pdf. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Matthew Kahn
The Supreme Court intonated in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm by Alex Woolgar
This has led to a number of success stories and legislative reforms on a national scale. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
Stated otherwise, what is the relationship between trademark awareness and brand strength? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
 Public participation and its consideration by the Committee Between December 2022 and May 2023, the NCOP carried out a large-scale provincial public participation exercise, presenting the Copyright Amendment Bill [B13D-2017] in several locations in all nine provinces. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:20 am
  If so, it is important to expressly state such right, because implied sublicensing might not be possible or at least uncertain, depending on a jurisdiction and licence exclusivity. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
  This approach is both profound and profoundly relevant to the actual state of contemporary regulatory governance in which states remain powerful but not the singular regulatory actors within the structures of global production. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:26 am by PJ Blount
Stating the reasons why protection is necessary. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am by Melina Padron
Burnley Training College Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2928 (Admin) (24 August 2011) November 9, 2011 Admin Court: Refusal of licence for Burnley college under Home Secretary’s policy to prevent abuse by overseas students was unlawful. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:16 am by Jeralyn
Clear regulations must be put in place to keep the government from tracking our movements on a massive scale. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm by Berin Szóka, Ari Cohn
  Hamburger insists otherwise, alluding to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Marsh v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 7:57 am by Kristian Stout
While S. 2305’s stated intention is to increase competition and reduce drug prices, it fails to consider several critical factors and could lead to unintended consequences. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 1:18 am by INFORRM
The Metropolitan Police stated that the journalist’s home was searched as part of an investigation into suspected terrorism offences under sections 1 and 2 of the Terrorism Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm by Jason Kelley
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]