Search for: "Seales v. State"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 3,449
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2011, 8:05 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
(Easterling v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm
A version of that right is entrenched in the constitutional law of the United States: the right of every human being – again, without exception – not to be subjected to any punishment that is “cruel and unusual”. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:59 am
Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE & PENSIONS
S5467 LIBOUS -- Relates to driving while intoxicated while in a position of care
Same as A 8061
BLURB : V & T L. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver receptacle with increased cooling US… [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
He spends considerable time in the rest of the chapter in analyzing the elements of a signature – notably its existence, the identity of the signatory and the intent with which it was made – over several centuries of law, from 'pre-signatures' (seals, objects) through various forms of mark to printed letterheads and mechanically-signed cheques. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
Grasshopper House, LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
See, United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Let's look at updates state by state, and then turn to last Thursday's big development in Los Angeles. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
US v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:22 pm
While the circuit court split continues to widen regarding the interpretation of unauthorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the recent decision in U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Moreover, the draft instrument properly circumvents the peculiar lack of an exemption from legalisation in the HCCH 2019 Convention by recognizing the seal of the court as sufficient authentication for the purposes of recognition and enforcement.[36] It remains to be seen if decisions of third states “domesticated” in [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
Infogroup, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
He has also published articles on presidential approval ratings during foreign policy crises, Army efforts toward gender integration, and the experiences of Hispanics in the United States Army. [read post]
