Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 5,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
If you’re a fan of the television series “Breaking Bad” you know the basic script for the important GPS tracking / 4th Amendment search and seizure case decided by the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:14 pm
The bottom line, all nine justices agreed, in what is generally a very divided court, that the GPS monitoring on the Jeep violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion, held that the installation of a GPS device on a suspect’s vehicle constitutes a search for Fourth Amendment purposes, and therefore it presumptively requires a warrant. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
He concluded that the installation of the device on the vehicle without a warrant was a trespass and therefore an illegal search. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
(a) The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:38 am
The Supreme Court has ruled GPS monitoring requires a warrant. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
And as Wikipedia explains, a “reasonable” search or seizure must be conducted pursuant either to a search (and seizure) warrant or to an exception to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
Jones, which addresses the question of whether it was a “search or seizure” under the Fourth Amendment when the police attached a GPS tracking device to a drug suspect’s car. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
The Court reiterated that the Fourth Amendment protects the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures" and held that the Government's physical intrusion on an effect to obtain information constituted a search. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:04 am
All nine justices agreed that the placement of the GPS on the Jeep violated the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:55 am
The court split 5-4 over the reasoning behind Monday’s decision, with Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority that as conceived in the 18th century, the Fourth Amendment’s protection of “persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” would extend to private property such as an automobile. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:40 am
All nine justices agreed that the placement of the GPS on the Jeep violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:40 am
All nine justices agreed that the placement of the GPS on the Jeep violated the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Maryland Criminal Attorney -The Supreme Court today in a rare showing of unity among its liberal and conservative members, ruled that the police may not secretly place a GPS monitoring device on a suspect's vehicle to track his movements without first obtaining a search and seizure warrant. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
(a) The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:36 am
On or about June 29, 2010, after receiving a copy of the criminal search warrant, ORTMANN sent an e-mail entitled “Re: Search Warrant – Urgent” to DOTCOM and three representatives of Carpathia Hosting in the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:35 am
All nine justices of the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that police officers violated the Fourth Amendment rule against unreasonable search and seizure when they attached a GPS device to a suspect's car and tracked it for 28 days without a warrant. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:48 am
In addition to the arrests, approximately 20 search warrants have also been executed within the United States and in eight additional countries. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:05 pm
Gardner, supra, the trial court erred when it denied the motion to suppress based solely upon the fact that a warrant for Hines's arrest was outstanding at the time of the search and seizure. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
Plaintiffs’ claim as medical marijuana growers against federal search warrants did not state a claim under the Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments because of Gonzalea v. [read post]
