Search for: "Shields v. Shields" Results 3361 - 3380 of 6,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 1:14 pm by Howard Ullman
Noting the exception for injuries in adjacent markets if “inextricably intertwined” with the injury sought to be inflicted upon the relevant market or participants, see Blue Shield of Va. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:09 am by Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C.
  In fact, the Alabama Supreme Court, in Roberts v Univ. of Alabama Hospital, held that the amounts a hospital accepts as full payment from Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Medicare and Medicaid are not relevant when considering whether the hospital’s charges are reasonable. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:09 am by Siniard, Timberlake & League, P.C.
  In fact, the Alabama Supreme Court, in Roberts v Univ. of Alabama Hospital, held that the amounts a hospital accepts as full payment from Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Medicare and Medicaid are not relevant when considering whether the hospital’s charges are reasonable. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 5:30 am
To answer that question, David turns to Stone v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm by Richard Primus
  If being out of office shields an impeachment defendant from conviction, then that shield no longer protects President Trump. [read post]