Search for: "Springs v. Springs"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 6,441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2014, 4:04 pm
The Member Survey indicates that 25% of members read the CLLR from cover to cover and another 42% read some but not all of the articles.Copyright Committee:The Committee posted an article on the CALL/ACBD committee space and the CALL/ACBD blog on the Authors Guild v Google Books, Inc.and Authors Guild v HathiTrustlitigation in the US. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:20 pm
Marie Templo-Capule Spring Intersession June 2-6 Class Description: Legal tools that answer more complex legal research problems, including federal legislative histories, sources of administrative law, specialized subject research. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:30 pm
And just last spring, Justice Thomas corrected a scientific term in his decision on gene patenting, Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:13 am
People v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:45 pm
Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:54 am
The appeals court further found that the trial court erred in denying liquidated damages to the employee, explaining that the jury’s finding that the employer acted in good faith was only “advisory,” that the jury’s rejection of the proffered reasons for not rehiring the employee was binding, and that a finding of intentional retaliation sets a very high bar for showing good faith (Jackson v City of Hot Springs, May 12, 2014, Gruender, R). [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:40 am
From whence does that right spring? [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:45 am
The case is a 1999, San Antonio Court of Appeals case styled, Wallis v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
In his May 9, 2014 order in Wright v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm
For now, enjoy your Spring … and go Giants! [read post]
11 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Wheeler and Huston v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:56 am
Powell v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 10:05 pm
Supreme Court, and the Court vacated the judgment against him and remanded after its Second Amendment ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 9:25 am
Sincerely, Robert V. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Surely, there are no more memos or opinions concurring or dissenting in part to write, and the Justices can finally spring the case upon us. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:16 am
Of the two, one would prefer to cover United States v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:09 pm
As important as were the doctrinal shifts wrought by National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:33 pm
A review by Pedro Reina-Pérez* Originally published in ReVista, the Harvard Review of Latin America (Spring 2014)— Reprinted with permission of the author and ReVista, the Harvard Review of Latin America Article in ReVista the Harvard Review of Latin America (Spring 2014) Derecho al Derecho: Intersticios y Grietas del Poder Judicial en Puerto Rico, Editors Érika Fontánez-Torres and Hiram Meléndez-Juarbe (Cabo Rojo: Editora Educación… [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:46 am
<> City of Pomona v. [read post]
