Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 3361 - 3380
of 29,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2022, 8:45 am
State prosecutors lack jurisdiction in such zones, so the federal government handles crimes there, and it is not always clear whether criminal laws at the state level apply. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:16 pm
The Brady Rule came out of the Brady v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:38 pm
From today's opinion in Blattert v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
In Iskanian v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:18 pm
Monster Energy Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:18 am
The post SCOTUS Denies Request to Review 11th Circuit Decision of DuBay v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:14 am
Harassment v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
It has a licensing department, and an annual litigation budget in the billions of dollars (an Optis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
The diagnosis must meet the Diagnostic Statistics Manual V (DSM V) standards. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
Version 1.0 of the panel opinion contained an unfortunate, oblique reference to Microsoft v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:15 am
Traditionally, decisions have been made at very senior levels, typically by the Secretary of State, based on information that is developed, marshaled and analyzed by relevant State Department bureaus, including the relevant regional bureau, the Office of Global Criminal Justice, Bureau of Intelligence and Research and the Office of the Legal Adviser. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
That should not, however, disqualify the studies’ findings from generalizability at the state level. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:30 pm
At its core, trustees must act honestly and with the expected level of due care and skill in adopting an appropriate investment policy. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm
It is telling that no defendant in any of the recent high profile SLAPP cases sought to strike out the claims under the existing Wallis v Valentine [2002] EWCA Civ 1034 jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm
It also states outright that it does not gather data from the bidstream. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:02 am
In 2011 the Texas Supreme Court issued its decision in Marsh USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
Indeed, the extra calculation will only substantially increase overall compliance costs and force automakers to prioritize sourcing minor parts over macro-level advancements in vehicle parts and technologies when trying to meet the USMCA’s RVC thresholds (not to mention the other requirements related to steel, aluminum, and LVC).205. [read post]
