Search for: "State v. M. V." Results 3361 - 3380 of 29,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2004, 10:41 am
And I'm guessing she's not going to be using the CCC as a base to look for a job. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:50 am
A while back, I started following a cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
"I'm always intrigued when I see ten-character sentences in a judicial opinion. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
  The state's taking away someone's liberty, so we want to make sure we're doing the right thing. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:38 pm
(Which is something we really, really want.)The student sues, and since it's a state-sponsored college, there's an 11th Amendment problem, which ultimately leads (in an earlier opinion) to the Ninth Circuit finding that qualified immunity exists on the student's claim for damages. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:15 pm
Or, to use the lingo we employ in the federal judiciary, to certify questions to the state supreme courts.Truthfully, I'm often in favor of certification. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d) by readily attributing error to the state court in violation of Woodford v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:10 pm
"Now, I'm not a monster Garrison Keillor fan, and know a personal detail or two about the guy from a firsthand source that aren't too flattering, but I nonetheless thought the reference meaningful as well as enlightening.Here's the second:"There’s an old saying:  Crime doesn’t pay, but at least you’re your own boss. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
 (And I'm not going to even address the additional complexity of Judge Bea's dissent on this issue, or whether you're permitted to evaluate the dissent's reasoning in a case with no majority opinion that involves the issue of whether you're permitted to evaluate the dissent's reasoning in a case with no majority opinion.)Fear not. [read post]