Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 19,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:52 am
The Federal Circuit also reiterated that the TTAB need not find that the German company owned U.S. trademark rights to bring a cancellation action (Piano Factory Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:06 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
In support of this position, Hallsworth refers to Star Industrial Company Ltd v Yap Kwee Kor t/a New Star Industrial Company [1976] FSR 256, which stated that-- a purchaser of a mark becomes owner of it only if he becomes at the same time purchaser of the manufactory or the business concerned in the goods to which the mark has been affixed. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
This provides: "Unless otherwise provided in this Regulation, a Community trade mark court shall apply the rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark in the Member State in which the court is located. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:16 pm
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
"The Board found the mark to be at most suggestive of the goods. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
Did you know that in 1935 applicant built the world’s largest grand piano, for the Silver Jubilee of King George V and Queen Mary? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:04 am
" United States Soccer Federation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
In a 4-3 decision, in State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
In the initial decision in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, the judge denied the motion for an injunction and stated that Louboutin’s trade mark was "likely not enforceable". [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:47 pm
I thank Attorney Mark A. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:19 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
” At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers the justices’ denial of review in Doe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
Dwayne Meadows) v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:33 am
Liberty Bell Equipment Corp. v. [read post]
