Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 3361 - 3380 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 7:22 pm
"High court to hear enemy combatant case": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report that begins, "The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether the president may order that people picked up in the United States be detained indefinitely and without criminal charges. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 6:39 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In their forthcoming article, Professors Dmitry Karshtedt, Mark A. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
” Areeda & Hovenkamp §5.02; accord, Kalinow­ski §24.02[1]; United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Accordingly, the PTO’s absolute ban on the registration of marks such as TRUMP TOO SMALL is far more extensive than necessary to protect the right of publicity, which would not prevent the use of TRUMP TOO SMALL under any state’s right of p [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that “in dozens of education cases in his more than 34 years on the court,” Stevens “was a voice for student rights, racial equality, and a high wall of separation between church and state. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
Lohr, a case in which the Supreme Court rejected the preemption of state court claims arguments. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
Lohr, a case in which the Supreme Court rejected the preemption of state court claims arguments. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:25 am by Eleonora Rosati
This very question was addressed a few days ago in the judgment that the General Court (GC) rendered in Zdút v EUIPO, T-250/21 (NEHRA). [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers the justices’ denial of review in Doe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm by Howard Knopf
 …The motions judge goes on to state:[10] The parties argued at some length about the current state of the law concerning grey marketing in Canada and whether, in particular, a Canadian trade-mark holder is entitled to enforce its trade-marks to prevent sales in Canada by third parties of genuine product purchased from the trade-mark holder’s foreign parent company. [read post]