Search for: "State v. Register" Results 3361 - 3380 of 13,695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am by Florian Mueller
He's now approaching the end of his second term (the first full term), and has positioned himself as the stalwart of making patents stronger at the expense of companies that create highly multifunctional products.Delaware's nickname is The First State, but it's also a tiny state, though a great place for registering companies. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
The contested patents involve a compound patent owned by Gilead and a second medical use patent owned by the government of the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
Tyrone Berger reports on attempts to register the mark "Pierre de Coubertin" (think Olympic Games). [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:55 am
Heasley).The TTAB has (almost always) followed the principle laid down by the CAFC in Herbko v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At Reason, Damon Root previews the Supreme Court’s next big Fourth Amendment case, Kansas v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:58 am by CMS
In particular Hassett v South Eastern Health Board (Case C-372/07) [2008] ECR I-7403 and Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe v JP Morgan Bank Chase Bank NA (Case C-144/10) [2011] WLR 2087 show that art 24 is to be construed narrowly and both were considered in the present case. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:14 am by Tom Zagorsky
Our Investment Adviser Group assists financial service providers with complex issues that arise in the course of their business, including complying with federal and state laws and rules. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  But again, I'm focused on the Ninth Circuit here.) (3) Four years later, in a follow up case, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Janene Marasciullo
  The SEC’s explanatory comments about the disclosure obligation endorsed restrictions regarding the use of the titles “advisor” and “adviser” and stated it would “presume” that BDs who are not also registered as RIAs violate the disclosure obligation when they refer to themselves or their RRs as  “advisors” or “advisers. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Janene Marasciullo
  The SEC’s explanatory comments about the disclosure obligation endorsed restrictions regarding the use of the titles “advisor” and “adviser” and stated it would “presume” that BDs who are not also registered as RIAs violate the disclosure obligation when they refer to themselves or their RRs as  “advisors” or “advisers. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm by sydniemery
Approximately 400 attorneys from around the nation registered to watch this event. [read post]