Search for: "States v. State" Results 3361 - 3380 of 258,339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2010, 9:35 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Stewart contends that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the State failed to disclose impeachment evidence as to their central witness, violating his [...] [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 9:25 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Kubat argues the trial court should have granted his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal following presentation of the State's case and should not have instructed the jury on provocation. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:42 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Due Process Mandatory minimum sentences The State appeals an order granting Thompson a new trial after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child under the age of thirteen. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:55 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Writ of actual innocence — Newly discovered evidence Nearly 30 years after he was convicted of first-degree murder and handgun offenses, Anthony Johnson, the appellant, filed a petition for writ of actual innocence in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City based on (1) a 1998 letter from a State’s witness recanting his ... [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:50 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Motor Vehicles OWI; prior convictions Prior suspensions of a driver's operating privilege under another state's 'zero tolerance' law are convictions within the meaning of secs. 343.307(1)(d) and 340.01(9r). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
He argues that his attorney was ineffective because the State "materially and substantially breached the plea agreement" and his attorney failed to object. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:39 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Lewd and Lascivious Behavior Sufficiency of the evidence The State charged Andrew Bolin with one count of lewd and lascivious behavior under Wis. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:07 am by sally
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening); SM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); AM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); KM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening) [2012] UKSC 38; [2012] WLR (D) 226 “A claim for asylum should not be defeated on the ground that an individual who had no political views, and who therefore did not support the persecutory regime in his home… [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 7:30 am by Gene Quinn
This seemed to culminate in the 1998 ruling of the Federal Circuit in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]