Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 3,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
Id. at 8 (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:04 am
All State's attorney, Stephen R. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:28 am
The United States Supreme Court decided the highly anticipated Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
Justices Stephen G. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The case is now pending before the United States Appeals Court for the Second Circuit. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
Stephens United Methodist Church, 329 S.C. 433, 441, 494 S.E.2d 827, 831 (Ct. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
The Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA) provides in pertinent part:In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word "marriage" means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and the word "spouse" refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or wife.DOMA is a pretty nasty law, depriving… [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:31 am
Symetra CNA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:28 pm
United States) is notable for revealing his concern over unequal access to documents between State Parties and the limitations on the Court's ability to establish and assess facts. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 2:42 am
And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
Representing the United States as amicus curiae, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole A. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
V. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:10 am
Souter delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
