Search for: "Stevens v. Stevens" Results 3361 - 3380 of 10,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 3:56 am by NCC Staff
On June 23, 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in the controversial, landmark case of Kelo v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:56 am by Will Field
(AP Photo/Dennis Cook) On June 23, 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in the controversial, landmark case of Kelo v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
  Justice Stevens supported the above conclusion with a citation to Village of Euclid v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:25 pm by Anna Christensen
  Finally, Justice Stevens observed that, in Carlson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
Steven gave an example of the Canadian Federal Court case of Lilly Icos v Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals (2006) FC 1465, where communications between Pfizer and a UK patent attorney was held not to be privileged. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 4:44 pm by Howard Bashman
According to the article, “A petition filed by attorney Paul Clement with the high court Thursday asked the court to take the case and find the rule requiring fishermen to pay for the monitors is inconsistent with the Magnuson-Stevens fishing act or to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 Chevron v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Find out the answer and have a bit of weekend fun by checking out this Sesame Street appearance in which Justice Sonia Sotomayor puts down her taza de café (she and her host kaffee-klatsch in Spanish as well as English) and struts her solomonic stuff:Hat tip to Bridget Crawford at Faculty Lounge for news of this appearance, which follows fast upon the interview between retired Justice John Paul Stevens, author of a stinging dissent in the campaign finance case, Citizens United… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:55 am
Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2003, 11:05 am
Read Eldred v Ashcroft - Opinion by Ginsburg [opinion text, PDF], with dissents by Stevens [dissent text, PDF] and Breyer [dissent text, PDF]. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 12:04 am
(image credit) In his opinion for the Court in Wallace v. [read post]