Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 14,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 1:22 pm
Constitution The case, Evans v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:57 am
R. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:57 am
R. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:12 am
Each is concerned with whether the government’s interests are strong enough to justify the burden on individual rights. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:50 am
Supreme Court SEC v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
If a statute was ambiguous, but had been considered by lower courts, there should be a strong presumption against overturning that settled practice. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:43 pm
United States Post Off. of Shelbyville, Indiana (S.D. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:35 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
Publishing its decision in Ohio v. [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 5:20 pm
See Hill v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
On July 29, 2015, BakerHostetler filed an amicus brief with the Second Circuit on behalf of the Center for Democracy and Technology, joined by five prominent nonprofit public interest groups, for the en banc rehearing of United States v. [read post]
Supreme Court Holds That PAGA Representative Waivers Are Enforceable In Certain Significant Respects
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am
On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 1:21 pm
In the case of Naverette v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
Last year, in Riegel v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:26 pm
Pfizer v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:15 am
In line with Thoma v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
"Bongiovanni stated he spoke with Nella on several occasions after her husband died and suggested to her that she execute a new will. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:13 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Apple & Eve, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 12:28 pm
This quote pretty much encapsulates the approach taken by the Supreme Court of Appeal in its judgment which it handed down earlier today in the matter of Schabir Shaik v The State. [read post]
