Search for: "Strong v. Strong"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 19,595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2019, 10:08 am
According to the complaint, Lyft’s statements about company’s business metrics, growth potential, and financial prospects were not as strong as presented in the offering materials. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:22 am
Sometimes it seems that the British system, where witness preparation is frowned upon, makes a good deal of sense.We are not sure quite how to feel about the recent decision in Hunt v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:34 am
In Bailey v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:08 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
Sources: https://www.doj.state.wi.us/dles/bjia/domestic-abuse-data https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/968/075 https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/893/V/57? [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
"And in precisely two months from today, the Epic Games v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This means the plaintiff did not engage in protected speech under the First Amendment, and he cannot redress what he calls his retaliatory termination.The case is Shara v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 pm
The Wall Street Journal reported today that the Wisconsin trade secrets case of United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 3:30 am
The policyholder will have his day in court. 1Dean v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division observed that "A court may vacate an arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his [or her] powers within the meaning of CPLR 7511(b)(1)(iii) only where the arbitrator's award violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Co. v Hereford Ins. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:27 am
Plaintiff wins the appeal as the Court of Appeals reinstates the case.The case is Michel v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:42 am
This case highlights a gloss on qualified immunity.The case is Chase v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:05 am
The case is Sousa v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 3:29 am
Fricker’s Progressive Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:17 am
Addressing the penalty imposed on Petitioner, the Appellate Division, noted that the Petitioner's record established that Petitioner consistently received "strong evaluations for his work performance" and that Petitioner had "expressed remorse and that he was not proud of his conduct. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:27 am
In this case, Whiting v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:10 pm
The same could be said for Jews in Europe once liberalism got a strong foothold there. [read post]
