Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2011, 1:31 am
., Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:07 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:50 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41 (28 January 2011) Hope and Glory Public House Ltd, R (on the application of) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 31 (26 January 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Shah v General Pharmaceutical Council [2011] EWHC 73 (Admin) (28 January 2011) Jones v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC 50 (Admin) (27 January 2011) Oadby Hilltop and Meadowcroft… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 am
Richard Norton-Taylor. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:23 am
Individuals performing services for a public employer may be designated "non-employees" by statute Levitt v NYC Office of Collective Bargaining, 273 AD2d 104For the purposes of collective bargaining Article 14 of the Civil Service Law -- the Taylor Law -- applies to all individuals in the services of a public employer except judges, individuals in the military service and public employees designated managerial or confidential. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
§ 23.18 Recovery of Loss of Consortium Damages by Children for Injuries to Parent The Case: Taylor v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:51 pm
If, on the other hand, the employer wishes to terminate the probationer before he or she has completed the minimum probationary period required for the position, it may do so only after bringing disciplinary action against the employee and holding a disciplinary hearing or proceeding with a Taylor Law disciplinary arbitration. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:58 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. at 410, 120 S.Ct. at 1522 (“[A]n unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application of federal law. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) JIH v News Group Newspapers, heard 14 January 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ) Brady -v- Norman, heard 19 January 2011 (The President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Smith and Aikens LJJ) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd, heard 20-21 January 2011… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
Armenta v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:50 am
Supreme Court case, Snyder v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:05 am
In Lacy-McKinney v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:28 am
Name clearing hearingsOrtiz v Ward, 546 NY2d 624The Appellate Division, 1st Department, was asked to consider the issue of the right of a probationer discharged after the employer determines that he or she has not satisfactorily completed his or her probationary period to either (1) a "pre-termination hearing" before being discharged or (2) a “name-clearing hearing" following his or her termination.As to the right to a "pre-termination hearing," the Court said… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm
Carrier/Kreiner v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
There have been a number of settlements of libel actions which have resulted in apologies but no statement in open court – for example, Ed Buxton v News Group (the “Sun”) and NOW Magazine, Eason v Kordowski (Solicitors from Hell), Sawalha v Phillips (libel on Spectator blog), Laker v News Group (body scanner libel), Islam Expo v Spectator, Forzini v Times Newspapers, Gordon Taylor v Associated Newspapers… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:03 pm
A copy of the rejection motion can be found here.Anchor Blue is being represented in the bankruptcy cases by the law firms of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
The district argued that PERB had exclusive jurisdiction over such issues.The Commissioner ruled that his disposition of the appeal considered matters unrelated to the Taylor Law and thus his dismissal of Fusco’s appeal and deferral to PERB was not required.In addition, the district asked the Commissioner for permission to submit two additional documents it claimed addressed substantive issues related to Fusco’s conduct after it had filed its answer to Fusco’s petition:1. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:57 am
[Contract provisions agreed upon in the course of collective negotiations pursuant to the Taylor Law cannot not override a statutory mandate.] [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
Discontinuing General Municipal Law Section 207-c disability benefitsGamma v Bloom, 274 AD2d 14In Gamma, the Appellate Division concluded that an agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law can set out the controlling procedures for resolving disputes concerning Section 207-c benefits, including resolving any dispute concerning light duty assignments and the continuation of such benefits through arbitration.City of Newburgh police officer Stephen J. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
(workers’ compensation statutes do allow for death benefits to be paid, and thus any recovery from a third-party tortfeasor for wrongful death is subject to subrogation liens by the employer); Taylor v. [read post]
