Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 6,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2017, 8:45 am
The application was reviewed by a United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) examiner, who ultimately determined that there were no conflicting marks that would bar registration of this mark and the application was published for opposition in August of 2016. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:53 am
The editor suggests that, it is the “ideal, concise reference book for patent attorneys, patent agents, patent draftsmen, inventors, libraries, science and invention museums, and people outside of the United States applying for a U.S. patent. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:15 pm
Department of Commerce's United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") will host its first Cybersecurity Partnership Meeting tomorrow, Friday, November 14, 2014, in Menlo Park, California. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:14 am
[I submitted the following comments to the USPTO] __ To: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce From: Prof. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Moreover, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) also adds a level of complexity since they will promulgate examination guidelines on how to implement the rules based on these and subsequent cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:52 am
Storie holds a B.A. from Miami University (Ohio) and received his J.D. from the Cumberland School of Law of Samford University.The new members will serve three-year terms on the committees, which were created by the 1999 American Inventors Protection Act to advise the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on the management of patent and trademark… [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
December 22, 2015) which struck down as facially unconstitutional Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act which bars the United States Patent and Trademark Office from registering scandalous, immoral or disparaging marks. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:32 am
” Not only does this case raise the question of whether the government can take on the roles of both the sovereign power (i.e., the United States Patent and Trademark Office as issuer of the patent and the USPTO’s PTAB as the tribunal for evaluating the validity of the challenged patent) and essentially a private party (i.e., the U.S. government and its U.S. [read post]
1 May 2018, 11:55 am
On April 26, 2018, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a guidance, applying SAS Institute v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:16 pm
On the same day Walgreens filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office before the Trademark Trial And Appeal Board a "Notice of Opposition (.PDF)" to the registration of the Wegmans trademark Application Serial No.85/037,348 for the mark WEGMANS. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:50 am
" patent (23 July 2007):On March 25, 2013, a submission of prior art under 37 CFR1.501 was made with respect to Twitter's United States Patent No. 8,401,009 on a "device independent message distribution platform. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:04 pm
A good starting off point is searching the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s TESS database for conflicting marks. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:40 am
Ct. 28 (Sept. 25, 2007) (No. 06-937).6 See Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office, Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications: Final Rule (Aug. 21, 2007).7 Tafas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:04 pm
Reference to title 35, United States Code.Sec. 3. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:32 pm
The United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released guidelines for AI patentability in February 2024. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
During the litigation, the district court admonished Kilopass for making claim construction arguments in the case that contradicted its arguments in a concurrent reexamination of the patent before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
Notably, Cellectis’ announcement failed to mention that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has ordered a reexamination of the ’372 patent, agreeing with Precision that there are substantial new questions regarding patentability that require further examination by the USPTO. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
It’s reported that approximately 88% of new applications are initially rejected by the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”), and most applicants can expect up to 3 rejections before their application is allowed. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
Take it away, Josh:As any IP lawyer will readily admit, trademark practice before the United States Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) comes with its fair share of annoyances: inconsistent treatment of similar applications, unreasonably stringent identification requirements, and so forth. [read post]
