Search for: "USA v. Doe"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 4,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
Part I is at this link, Part II is at this link, Part III may be read here, and Part V, the conclusion, will appear tomorrow.]In the first three parts of this series (linked above), we analyzed Article X of the Constitution concerning amendments and additions to the liturgy of the Episcopal Church (USA), and saw how it would be impossible for the present General Convention, meeting in Indianapolis, to adopt a rite for same-sex blessings… [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 3:06 am
Technically this is not correct: a settlement does not create legal precedent (the court has not ruled on the dispute) and the High Court has heard several ‘revenge porn’ claims over the past decade (see for instance Contostavlos v Mendahun [2012] EWHC 850 (QB)). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:15 am
In 1803, in Marbury v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Supreme Court in Pena-Rodriquez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Hearst Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 11:54 am
The new dispute centers on the timing of lower-court actions that are to follow the Justices’ decision last Tuesday in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:32 am
If other public disclosures adequately inform security holders that particular transactions have occurred, further tolling of the time for bringing suit to disgorge profits from those transactions is unwarranted, concluded the brief.Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:42 pm
It is aware of the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Asadi v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
So you can imagine my glee when a loyal reader of this blog shared with me Justice Scalia's recent opinion granting a stay in a tobacco class action, Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:08 am
In Burak Powers v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Article V, which permits amendment, exists because the Framers were persuaded that the powerful would find ways to circumvent the limits that were built in. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:22 pm
The TTIP will have to satisfy the conditions of both art XXIV GATT and art V Gats. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:17 pm
From the Complaint in Parker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:27 am
Summary judgment was affirmed (Davis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
He and his administration endorse the elimination of abortion and pretend that Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 11:37 am
The interim president of Ukraine, Oleksandr V. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm
DiMattia et al. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:26 pm
In the aftermath of the Schrems II ruling, Věra Jourova, the Vice President of the European Commission for Value and Transparency has stated in an official press conference that the European Commission will work with their American counterparts to discuss a way forward. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
******************* USA data breach class actions are commonplace. [read post]
