Search for: "United States v. Man"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 6,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Commenters on a recent thread raised some excellent questions: [LawyerHouston:] If a man from a country which allows him multiple wives moves with his wives to the United States, what is his status vis-a-vis his wives in the United States? [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
The Solicitor General, in an amicus brief, argued on behalf of the United States that trustees of ERISA plans owed a continuing duty of prudence, which they breach by failing to research fund options and offer available lower-cost institutional-class investments during the six-year period prior to the filing of the complaint. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
The Solicitor General, in an amicus brief, argued on behalf of the United States that trustees of ERISA plans owed a continuing duty of prudence, which they breach by failing to research fund options and offer available lower-cost institutional-class investments during the six-year period prior to the filing of the complaint. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
(Most other states take the same view.) [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
He is a 1994 graduate of Yale Law School and a former law clerk to Judge Kermit Lipez of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
He is a 1994 graduate of Yale Law School and a former law clerk to Judge Kermit Lipez of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
In Hayas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:34 am
The Washington State Supreme Court faced up to its own earlier error, holding in State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
"Source: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/florida-v-harris/Tampa Drug Defense Attorney has received an interesting comment on Drug Sniffing Dogs from one of our anonymous sources.I post the anonymous comment it in its entirety:"The dog lovers at the United States Supreme Court have once more dissed the dog haters at the Florida Supreme Court (I'm a cat person myself). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:07 am
For instance, last year, a three-judge panel of the 3rd Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:20 am
However, as the Safe Harbor only permits transfers from the EU to the United States, it is not a global solution. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:43 am
In De La Vera v Holguin, 2014 WL 4979854 (D. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am
The strange little case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, Connor H. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 1:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 8:32 am
Osprey L.L.C. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:31 am
Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma) reached the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
