Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 9,491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 3:30 am
When presenting the court with the marriage equality cases, United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm
Carr to Bush v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 10:18 am
” The majority opinion cited United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:05 pm
In this case (Estate of Presley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
The controversial Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:27 am
Youts, supra (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:07 am
Power Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:27 pm
That rejection was correct under Montana election law, the majority held: There is one Section within [Montana election law]—the Montana Absent Uniformed Services and Overseas Voter Act—that expressly authorizes the use of "digital signatures" for active-duty United States military members and United States citizens residing outside the United States but eligible to vote. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
When the Supreme Court entertains argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 10:08 am
(The Ninth, to its great credit, doesn’t know either).United States v. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
Last December marked the 28th anniversary of the Budapest Memorandum, in which the United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia provided security commitments to Ukraine in exchange for the latter joining the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) as a non-nuclear state. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Bill Olson – 1 Promoted Comment The United States government’s position in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:29 am
United States, the government informed the D.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:10 pm
Like many such unfocused fusillades, though, she misses every mark. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm
In APPLE INC. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 8:25 am
The case is Morse v. [read post]
