Search for: "V D" Results 3361 - 3380 of 76,414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” In her complaint, the plaintiff alleged that, “after waiting a number of years and having little communication,” the defendant Christopher D. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
By the way, for those who do not read Hebrew, this is what in English is called a jot but which in Hebrew is the tenth letter of the alphabet (yud):What is called a tittle is a pen stroke that distinguishes a dalet (on the left) from a resh (on the right):Dalet is letter D, resh letter R, so the tittle helps distinguish these two, much like minding your Ps and Qs This is all well and fine in writing alphabets, but what distinguishes the internal text of an EU Directive from having to be… [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [France][Petition granted][ Mother’s motion for reconsideration denied] Peyre v McGarey, 2023 WL 4351544 (D. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [Ireland][ motion to appoint a guardian ad litem denied] McElliott v McElliott 2023 WL 4764816  (D. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 Mexico][Petition granted][wrongful removal][no grave risk of harm] Godinez v Godinez. 2023 WL 3727863, (D. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [Mexico][Petition granted][Stay pending appeal denied] Godinez v Godinez, 2023 WL 4295763 (D. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Contrairement à ce que font valoir les appelants, rien dans R. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:35 pm
Las ramificaciones adicionales de la licencia de conducir incluyen posibles aumentos en las tarifas del seguro y una suspensión de la licencia de conducir por 90 días impuesta por el tribunal. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm
Instead, it ordered $8,511 in temporary spousal support to Michelle, and said that it'd work out later whether the prenup was valid -- and, if it turned out that it was, that Michelle would likely have to pay back the money.At which Peter files an appeal.In a fairly erudite opinion, Justice Sanchez affirms. [read post]