Search for: "W. D." Results 3361 - 3380 of 13,758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2019, 9:16 am by Joe Consumer
If they hadn’t, we’d know that things were even more corrupt than we thought at the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) asked Barr about his defense of George W. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Next, the Court was tasked with determining if the FAA’s exemption for “contracts of employment” includes only traditional (read: W-2) employees or whether it also applies to independent contractors. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
As Justice Kennedy stated in his dissent opinion, “(w)hile a warrant allows the Government to enter and seize and make the examination itself, a subpoena simply requires the person to whom it is directed to make the disclosure” (emphasis added). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Victor Medina
In fact, if you’d like, you can go onto Spotify, which is a free streaming music service. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
W. et al., "Multitrees: Enriching and Reusing Hierarchical Structure", Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI'94, 1994, ACM, pp. 330-336.III. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:00 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Due to the 2017 tax reform law, extensive changes are required to the Form W-4. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:56 am by Daniel Jovanov
” The appellate court concluded that “[w]hile these damages were reasonably foreseeable, they are consequential and not general or direct damages. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:38 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Interoperability will be a key priority for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (“ONC”) going forward. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 11:32 am by Kate Fort
” (You had to know I’d end a series of ICWA posts on the case I found the most frustrating.) [read post]
The intricacies of the Medicare program will be on display at the Supreme Court next week, in a case challenging a major Department of Health and Human Services payment determination issued without notice-and-comment procedures. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:35 am by Marty Lederman
  "[W]hat is of paramount importance," the SG argues, "is permitting the Secretary of Defense to implement the policy that, in his judgment after consultation with experts, best serves the military’s interests" between now and the time the Court resolves the merits.I’d be somewhat surprised if there are five votes on the Court to stay the injunctions (unless it's part of a compromise among the Justices that pushes the merits determination… [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
  You don’t wаnt them in your dwelling. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Danielle D’Onfro had this blog’s argument preview; Grace Brosofsky and Luís L. [read post]