Search for: "Wal-Mart StoresĀ " Results 3361 - 3380 of 3,713
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 11:05 pm by The Complex Litigator
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc), the trial court applied essentially identical standards and correctly decided the issue. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:25 pm
  In 2008, several high-profile websites were targeted, including USA Today, ABC News, Target and Wal-Mart and simply visiting one of these infected websites could have resulted in the user's computer being infected. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm by Charles Casper
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:10 am by Greg Mersol
The Court emphasized that it was not altering the holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:37 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young As readers of our blog know from prior posts, we have argued successfully before several courts that the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 11:43 am
The Court found without hesitation that the class met the standard for commonality under the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:00 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
More motions to dismiss being granted If ECJ-based (and other food label claims) have a limited shelf life going forward, their end would likely be precipitated not by the content of new FDA ECJ guidance but rather because cases like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:25 am by SHG
Given the right set of circumstances, the proper motivations, the idea of the Starbucks lawyer, much like the Wal-Mart lawyer, is not just fine, but a pretty darn good idea. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:01 am by Jenny Schell
 The law firm has brought Salmonella lawsuits against such companies as Cargill, ConAgra, Peanut Corporation of America, Sheetz, Taco Bell, Subway and Wal-Mart. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 504 F.Supp.2d 939, 947 (S.D.Cal.2007) (noting split of authority but finding that, with recent Proposition 64 reforms, the UCL now requires reliance); Anunziato v. eMachines, Inc., 402 F.Supp.2d 1133, 1137-39 (C.D.Cal.2005) (declining to read a reliance requirement into the UCL); In re Tobacco II Cases, 146 P.3d 1250 (2006) (granting petition for review on issue of whether UCL requires reliance); Def.'s Opp'n n. 5; Pl.'s Reply n. 7. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:04 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Melissa Smith
  Justice Kennedy further explained that this ability for individuals to rely on the statistical evidence in their individual cases distinguished this case from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:15 pm
., 199 USPQ 560 (TTAB 1978)), as well as the Supreme Court's decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]