Search for: "*u. S. v. Haves" Results 321 - 340 of 9,151
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
In 1975, the New York legislature clarified that an art gallery’s creditors do not hold an interest in works of art consigned by artists or the proceeds from sale of those works, which they otherwise would have held under the UCC’s consignment laws. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
He said that the lack of comparative precedent weakens Chevron’s foundations in and of itself. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Google: Judge Alsup’s new decision in Sonos v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Gopstein v Bellinson Law, LLC 2023 NY Slip Op 33476(U) October 4, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159060/2022 Judge: Mary V. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:34 pm by Kurt R. Karst
 Having a clear understanding of FDA’s data expectations for 510(k) applications related to implants is crucial for successful marketing clearance. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am by Jacob Wirz
” It proceeded from there to breadth, noting that, “[u]nder the Government’s reading of the” statute, “the Secretary would enjoy virtually unlimited power to rewrite the Education Act. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
SRCs with a June 30 fiscal year-end have until their Form 10-K or 20-F for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 to provide their first annual disclosures. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
SRCs with a June 30 fiscal year-end have until their Form 10-K or 20-F for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025 to provide their first annual disclosures. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:22 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In Han v Kwak (2023 NY Slip Op 33207[U] [Sup Ct, NY County Sept. 14, 2023]), the Court framed the issue as follows: This case ultimately turns on a purely legal question: whether rescission or rescissory damages are available solely against a defendant who is not a party to the transaction that he fraudulently induced. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:26 am by Andrea Shannon (US)
Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations and prior Supreme Court precedent in Petrella v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:26 am by Andrea Shannon (US)
Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations and prior Supreme Court precedent in Petrella v. [read post]