Search for: "*u. S. v. Kennedy"
Results 321 - 340
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 8:44 am
Leon, 468 U. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:20 pm
So, with a reminder of the test, Justice Kennedy went on to slap the wrists of the Court of Appeals:"This Court has "more than once cautioned that courts 'should not read into the patent laws limitations and conditions which the legislature has not expressed.'" (Diamond v Diehr (1981). [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am
Supreme Court may be tough to divine, given that swing-justice Anthony Kennedy mostly kept to himself during back-to-back oral arguments” this week in Ayestas v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
S., at 580 (Kennedy, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am
Olmstead v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am
But Lee’s conviction should still stand, the government argued, because the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:06 am
S. 861 (2000); Hillsborough County v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
S. 353, 299 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
Booker, 543 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
Booker, 543 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
S. ____, at 7 [citing Grutter v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am
See Byrd, 584 U. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
J., and SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined, and in which STEVENS, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined, as to Parts I, II, and III. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:29 am
The Court’s decision in Lewis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:02 am
The U. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Maryland, 373 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
S. 220 (2005). [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:03 am
Board of Education, 349 U. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
No: Justices Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Kennedy. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
