Search for: "*u.s. v. Gant"
Results 321 - 340
of 373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2009, 8:14 am
" Santana, 427 U.S. at 43. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:21 am
Defendant's argument that it was invalid as a search incident under Gant was not reached. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Sotomayor’s dissent in Gant v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:38 am
In the case of Arizona v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:21 pm
May 5, 2009).* Even if defendant could reopen his suppression hearing and guilty plea after Gant was decided, this was not a search incident under Gant. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:49 pm
The U.S. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:07 pm
Perhaps the most important criminal law decision issued so far this year, was that of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v Gant, â€â [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:32 am
The U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:07 pm
U.S. (07-1309). [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 10:22 am
The usual rule I impose upon myself is to not write about contemporary Supreme Court cases. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:45 am
(Cross-posted at PrawfsBlawg) In Chimel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the Court found in Michigan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:35 pm
Supreme Court, in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)); and Gregg v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:59 am
Gant, 556 U.S. __ (2009), found here: [www.supremecourtus.gov] (sorry, No Man won't help me do the fancy links), the arrestee was handcuffed and locked in the backseat of the police car. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm
In the recent decision of Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:01 pm
Yesterday the U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 10:32 am
In the recent United States Supreme Court decision, Arizona v. [read post]
