Search for: "1-16 Does" Results 321 - 340 of 18,915
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2018, 1:34 pm by stevetaber
On May 1, 2018, the State of California along with 16 states and the District of Columbia filed a Petition for Review (http://bit.ly/2jkLZgr) of the Trump Administration’s decision to withdraw the Obama Era tailpipe emissions standards for model years 2022-2025. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:11 pm by Kate Howard
Chicago Transit Authority 16-131 Issue: (1) Whether the Seventh Circuit erred in holding that the government disclosure bar, removed from the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by Congress in 1986, continues to bar qui tam suits based on false claims that are not publicly disclosed but only revealed to a federal agency—a question over which the Circuits have split; (2) whether a document can effect a “public disclosure” of false claims for purposes of… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 3:29 pm
The Antitrust Division does not take issuance of CIDs lightly. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:35 am by Laura Ray
The Federation of American Hospitals and American Hospital Association recently released Estimating the Impact of Repealing the Affordable Care Act on Hospitals, a report which modeled the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as laid out in the Restoring Americans’ Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act (H.R. 3762, vetoed by President Obama on 1/8/16). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm by Eric Caligiuri
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. et al, 1-16-cv-00041 (DDE 2020-07-16, Order) (Colm F. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 4:54 pm by Nick Robinson
The reasoning is that a person who has no right to vote is disqualified from registering in the electoral rolls (S. 16(1)(c) of RPA), implying that he/she is not an ‘elector’ (S. 2(1)(e) of RPA) – which is one of the qualifications for “being chosen to fill a seat” of the House of the People and a Legislative Assembly of a State (S. 4(d) and 5(c) of RPA).In other words, according to the judgment, if a person is in police custody, for reasons… [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 1:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
§ 16(a)(1)(B), and that provision does not provide any map to Federal Circuit jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:17 am by Jon Sands
  For him, because an § 846 conspiracy does not require an overt act, while a generic conspiracy does, an § 846 conviction cannot qualify for a 16-level upward adjustment. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 8:20 pm
[ABA Journal, Krauss/PoL] Tags: Barack Obama, sanctions Related posts February 1 roundup (0) Yes, I’m being facetious (16) Wrongs without remedies dept. (1) White House race roundup (8) When Clinton and Obama agreed (0) [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
But does the standard of patent validity actually matter? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm by Bruce Carton
You might think that after Volume 1, Volume 2, Volume 3, Volume 4, Volume 5, Volume 6, Volume 7, Volume 8, Volume 9, Volume 10, Volume 11, Volume 12, Volume 13, Volume 14, Volume 15 and Volume 16 of Things You Can't Do on a Plane, that we'd have exhausted the list of things you can't do on a plane. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:52 am
 The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has just issued its much-awaited judgment in Louboutin C-163/16, ruling that a mark consisting of a colour applied to the sole of a shoe is NOT covered by the prohibition of the registration of shapes. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:58 am by Amy Bray
These rules will go into effect on June 1, 2010 and may apply to some community associations. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:05 pm by Susan Mangiero
I am pleased to announce that I will be speaking in an upcoming live phone/web seminar entitled "ERISA Fiduciaries Under Attack: Key Litigation and Regulatory Developments" scheduled for Thursday, June 16, 1:00pm-2:30pm EDT. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:05 pm by Susan Mangiero
I am pleased to announce that I will be speaking in an upcoming live phone/web seminar entitled "ERISA Fiduciaries Under Attack: Key Litigation and Regulatory Developments" scheduled for Thursday, June 16, 1:00pm-2:30pm EDT. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:02 pm
Apr 20, 2007) (NO. 1:06 CV 16)Judge: Ron ClarkHolding: Defendant Alpha Scientific Corporation's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment DENIEDAnother day, another Eastern District court citing eighteenth century philosophers on the propriety of metaphysical arguments in claims construction. [read post]