Search for: "A B C INSURANCE COMPANIES, 1-10"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2013, 11:27 pm
However, ERISA section 4(b)(4) may exempt from ERISA coverage “plans maintained outside the United States primarily for the benefit of persons substantially all of whom are nonresident aliens. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 8:49 am
Among its employees; and b. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Next Door Company, et al. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
China National Chartering Company Ltd v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, Gard Marine and Entergy Ltd v China National Chartering Company Ltd & Anor, and Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, heard 1-3 November 2016. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
China National Chartering Company Ltd v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, Gard Marine and Entergy Ltd v China National Chartering Company Ltd & Anor, and Daiichi Chuo Kisen Kaisha v Gard Marine and Energy Ltd & Anor, heard 1-3 November 2016. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
This exemption shall not be available to any of the following: (A) A foreign issuer; (B) An investment company, as defined in Section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940; (C) A development stage company that either has no specific business plan or purpose or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person; or (D) A… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
Rather, Section 10(b) applies only to (1) “transactions in securities listed on domestic exchanges” and (2) “domestic transactions in other securities. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:11 am
To illustrate, Owen, a successful independent publisher, with a backlist of 75 books, decides to sell his company. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm
C. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd, heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:32 am
LEXIS 6059, *10. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:56 pm
All construction workers working for construction contractors after January 1, 2008 are presumed to be employees of the contractor by law unless they meet the specific exceptions listed in (b) and (c) below as set out in Section 10 of the new Employee Classification Act [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
FACTUAL BACKGROUND In October 2017, DFS initiated an investigation of the Carry Guard insurance program, focusing on two insurance companies, Chubb Ltd. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
”[1] Another says that this new era of corporate governance prompts “greater director engagement in risk oversight and monitoring activity, renewed emphasis on management-to-board reporting and increased director sensitivity to recognizing possible ‘red flags.'”[2] Adverse events that have materialized during the preceding two years constitute possible red flags that may in fact trigger a securities class action that alleges violations of Section… [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 2:08 pm
Helpfully, Application Note 1 to the fraud guideline clears that up: Application Note 1 to § 2B1.1 defines victim thus: "any person who sustained any part of the actual loss determined under subsection (b)(1) . . . . 'Person' includes individuals, corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:40 pm
Any condominium development approved prior to October 1, 2008 (10/1/2008) loses its FHA approval and must formally re-apply. 2. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:03 am
The Act’s Provisions Emerging Growth Companies and the IPO Process: Many of the changes in the JOBS Act are geared toward “emerging growth companies” (EGCs), which are defined broadly in the Act as companies with annual gross revenues under $1 billion in the most recent fiscal year. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Specifically, (1) Does a child named as a dependent on a parent’s asylum application have any protection from refoulement? [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
B [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
”[10] However, in practice, the “severe or pervasive” standard has resulted in a mixed bag of decisions, requiring claimants to compare the facts and circumstances of his or her particular case to other cases found to be actionable.[11] C. [read post]
