Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner" Results 321 - 340 of 11,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Under normal processes, the plaintiffs would first be required to file a claim, which would then be evaluated by an ADOL examiner before a determination is made. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 2:09 pm by Justia Team
Keep reading this post for four resolutions that can help breathe new life into your law firm’s website as you start working toward your 2024 goals. 1. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by James Kachmar
Elden appealed that dismissal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  Petitioner argued that the claims should cover identifying a biomolecule by making copies, examining the resulting ensemble, and inferring the identity of the original molecule. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  Similarly, the trial judge must examine prospective jurors first, followed by examination by the defendant or his lawyer. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am by Joseph L. Hyde
”  This post examines Lancaster to ascertain the direction of our Supreme Court’s avowed retreat from archaic pleading requirements. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am by Nathan Mannebach (US)
The Federal Circuit then made short work of GO’s appeal, concluding that whether a mark functions as a trademark is a question of fact and “GO’s challenge on appeal amounts to nothing more than a disagreement with the weight the Board assigned to the conflicting evidence. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am by Nathan Mannebach (US)
The Federal Circuit then made short work of GO’s appeal, concluding that whether a mark functions as a trademark is a question of fact and “GO’s challenge on appeal amounts to nothing more than a disagreement with the weight the Board assigned to the conflicting evidence. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 1:36 pm by Kyle Persaud
You will be allowed to cross-examine the other parent, and the other parent will be allowed to cross-examine you. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Mona Paulsen
The Appellate Body reasoned that a panel must examine the extent to which a product is ‘available’ in all markets to meet the requisite demand (para 5.71). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Mona Paulsen
The Appellate Body reasoned that a panel must examine the extent to which a product is ‘available’ in all markets to meet the requisite demand (para 5.71). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Kathleen Claussen
Framing the Case More importantly, the defendants raise these readings of the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Kathleen Claussen
Framing the Case More importantly, the defendants raise these readings of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 7:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Read reviews, ask for references, and check their standing with professional organizations. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 2:01 am by Eleonora Rosati
Translated: the BoA found Prada’s appeal not particularly well-construed and made a remark that reads a bit like a (figurative) slap on the wrist: since in the case at issue the applicant is exclusively relying on the inherent distinctiveness of the mark applied for, this argument cannot succeed, since, in particular, as it has been concluded, the elements forming the sign applied for do not allow to conclude that it diverges from the norm or customs of the sector… [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 1:24 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
NanoString has announced it will appeal the order in the UPC Court of Appeal in Luxembourg. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Jordan Lassiter
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit instructed the U.S. [read post]