Search for: "AB 1" Results 321 - 340 of 5,451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2017, 9:18 am by Alysha Stein-Manes
Although AB 2337 became effective on January 1, 2017, the statute did not require employers to comply with its notice requirements until the Labor Commissioner developed and posted a model notice on the Department of Industrial Relations’ website. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 5:59 am by Nietzer Wolf M.
Nach § 14 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbsatz 1 TzBfG ist die kalendermäßige Befristung eines Arbeitsvertrags ohne Vorliegen eines sachlichen Grundes bis zur Dauer von zwei Jahren zulässig. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 5:59 am by Nietzer Wolf M.
Nach § 14 Abs. 2 Satz 1 Halbsatz 1 TzBfG ist die kalendermäßige Befristung eines Arbeitsvertrags ohne Vorliegen eines sachlichen Grundes bis zur Dauer von zwei Jahren zulässig. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
Im Sinne der Vorsorge (Art. 1 Abs. 2 USG) kommen als Abfall nicht nur die Umwelt konkret gefährdende Sachen in Frage (vgl. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
I think one of the big unanswered questions of AB 510 is the following: Do the amendments concerning sentencing enhancements apply to a case in which the offense occurred prior to July 1, 2007, if the sentencing hearing takes place after July 1, 2007? [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:12 pm by Guest Author
AB 1222 exempts transit workers from the provisions of the PEPRA until the federal district court issues its decision or January 1, 2015, whichever is sooner. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 9:59 am by Bryan Hawkins
  On September 4, 2020, Governor Newsom signed AB 2257, which modifies (slightly) some of the rules and provisions of AB 5. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:00 am by Chelsea Hadaway
An amended version of AB 1228 was passed in the California Legislature on September 14, 2023, [1] which would raise minimum wages for fast food workers and water down the authority of the new Fast Food Council that was created in a bill passed last year. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on September 15 reversed a district court’s order enjoining the enforcement of California Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) codified as Labor Code Section 432.6. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on September 15 reversed a district court’s order enjoining the enforcement of California Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) codified as Labor Code Section 432.6. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on September 15 reversed a district court’s order enjoining the enforcement of California Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) codified as Labor Code Section 432.6. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 2:31 pm
  Under AB 749, with limited exception, all no-rehire provisions in employment settlement agreements entered into on or after January 1, 2020 in California will be void as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on September 15 reversed a district court’s order enjoining the enforcement of California Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) codified as Labor Code Section 432.6. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on September 15 reversed a district court’s order enjoining the enforcement of California Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) codified as Labor Code Section 432.6. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:00 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on September 15 reversed a district court’s order enjoining the enforcement of California Assembly Bill 51 (AB 51) codified as Labor Code Section 432.6. [read post]