Search for: "ACE LTD"
Results 321 - 340
of 768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 7:45 am
For those of you interested in which cases were chosen, the list is below: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial… [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Ltd., 2015 BCSC 1698 http://t.co/puJF533NII -> You want a 6% Google Tax? [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
The building was owned by Stonefield Estates Ltd but the entire building is subject to a 20-year lease to Dreamland Leisure. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 6:17 am
Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding [1973] AC 691). [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 4:40 pm
In Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253, the House of Lords provided some flexibility in respect of the interpretation of the term “likely” here but the judge considered simply that he had to show that “the defendant is likely to fail to establish one of the statutory defences”. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 5:48 am
Over the last few years, Miami has been a popular launching point for luxury brands, such as The Thompson Miami Beach, Ian Schrager’s EDITION Hotel South Beach, SIXTY Hotel’s Nautilus South Beach, AC Hotel by Marriott and fashion designer Tommy Hilfiger’s revitalization of The Raleigh Hotel as a hotel and private club. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am
Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd v Menelaou, heard 17-18 June 2015. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
They gave three reasons for their conclusion: No misuse of power Eclairs and Glengary sought to rely on the case of Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd [1974] AC 821 where it was held that the board had used their power for an improper purpose. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
The case of Gulati v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), to which the attention of this blog’s readers has already been drawn here, is a complex but important case. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:22 am
The House of Lords considered the effect of s 17(1) in Din (Taj) v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657, HL. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:53 pm
., Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd of Yamaguchi, Japan filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that HEC Pharm USA, Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey and HEC Pharm Co. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The Judge noted ([110]) that these included the protection of human autonomy and dignity (see Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 [51]). [read post]
17 May 2015, 2:57 am
Siehr recalled the landmark cases of Attorney-General of New Zealand v Ortiz, [1984] AC 1, Winkworth v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
This Anheuser-Busch decision was held to be entirely consistent with Lord Diplock’s speech in the landmark Advocaat passing-off case of Erven Warnink BV v J Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd [1979] AC 731. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:15 am
This lawsuit adds another two new Defendants, Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
It is now over ten years since the landmark decision in Campbell v MGN Ltd ([2004] 2 AC 457) established the misuse of private information (“MOPI”) tort (any lingering doubt that it might not be a tort has been eradicated by the Court of Appeal decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 311). [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for thought regarding… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am
International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc, heard 15 and 16 July 2014. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for thought regarding… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 the Privy Council will hear the appeal of regarding whether the Court of Appeal was wrong to have overturned the Judge’s rejection of the defence of qualified privilege following Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127. [read post]
