Search for: "ADAM S. GOLDSTEIN"
Results 321 - 340
of 494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Stephanie Francis Ward of the ABA Journal interviews and profiles Tom Goldstein of this blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Michael Shear, a White House correspondent for The Times who appears prominently in the series, is helping the newspaper’s Supreme Court correspondent, Adam Liptak, who is down in the press room to receive opinions. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog, represents the petitioners in the case, but the author of this post is not involved in the case.] [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
Joel Goldstein has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 4:45 am
Mary McNaughton-Cassill, Professor, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at San AntonioA5: Built to Last: Creating Robust and Durable Ombuds Programs, David Michael, Senior Program Advisor, National Institutes of Health; Ellen Goldstein, Director & Ombuds, University of California, San Francisco; Ronnie Thomson, Independent ConsultantConcurrent Sessions: Block B B1: What Would a New Ombuds Do? [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” At The Weekly Standard, Adam White explains that “the principles underlying [Justice Neil] Gorsuch’s opinion” in Sessions v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am
”And at Forbes, Adam Thierer praises the Court’s decision for “acknowledging that speech is speech. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
” Adam Pankratz and Natalie Turner discuss the decision at Ogletree Deakins, as does Brett Milano at The Harvard Gazette. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am
” Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak observes that in Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that Ginsburg appeared at the court on Friday for the first time since her surgery in December “to participate in a private conference at which the justices considered adding cases to the court’s docket. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Today’s second argument is in Opati v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the hotel/motel owners in Patel. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog; other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Bill Mears of CNN, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Mark Walsh of Education Week’s School Law blog, Jeremy P. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog, serves as counsel to the petitioners in Mohamad, but the author of this post is not involved in the case.] [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:36 pm
“‘Landmark’ is the only word that can be used to describe these rulings,” said Adam Goldstein, attorney advocate for the Student Press Law Center. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
Adam Liptak observes in The New York Times that “there is every reason to think a Justice Kavanaugh would continue to press one of his old boss [Kennedy]’s signature projects: dismantling campaign finance laws that restrict the ability of people and groups to spend money to influence elections. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 4:05 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “the justices were unusually engaged” in yesterday’s argument, “[p]erhaps … because they are themselves older federal workers, albeit ones with life tenure. [read post]
