Search for: "ADOPTION OF GEORGIA & another" Results 321 - 340 of 1,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:59 am by Robert N. Stavins
On Jan. 20, Joe Biden will be inaugurated as the 46th president of the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:10 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
I am a member of the State Bar of Georgia, or in other words, I am a lawyer who is licensed to practice law in Georgia. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
The students also warn of another possible side effect of a ruling against them. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
-elect Luke Letlow’s death from COVID-19 has been met with shock and grief from fellow lawmakers, offering another stark example of the lethality of a pandemic. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 7:42 pm
The first answer is that it is the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution, adopted in 1804, that requires the two Houses so to meet. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Arizona and New Mexico increased their top marginal individual income tax rates by adding another bracket. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 1:46 am
The first answer is that it is the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution, adopted in 1804, that requires the two Houses so to meet. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 9:50 pm by Brett Holubeck
Union Elections and Organizing Increases this Year Especially in the Tech Sector  This is another prediction that came true. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Allie Gottlieb
In 2009, under then-governing preclearance requirements, the Justice Department objected to a proposal from Georgia to adopt an exact match policy, finding that it presented “real, substantial,” “retrogressive” “and erroneous” burdens on voters of color. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Allie Gottlieb
In 2009, under then-governing preclearance requirements, the Justice Department objected to a proposal from Georgia to adopt an exact match policy, finding that it presented “real, substantial,” “retrogressive” “and erroneous” burdens on voters of color. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Series of Essays
Food and Drug Administration recently adopted a “risk-based” framework to regulate medical software. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
The ZOMBIE Act requires candidates to close campaign accounts within six months of not filing to run for reelection or another federal office. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Online platforms may find it hard to justify a retreat from the measures they adopted for 2020. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:58 am by Chris Castle
The good news is the bad news is wrong–our work is not over, but we live to fight another day–or another 300 days. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 11:01 am by Benjamin Wittes
Axios is reporting that President Trump “plans to issue a wave of pardons today, moving to expedite acts of clemency before Christmas, according to a source with direct knowledge and advocates who have been briefed on the plans. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
The agency voting to adopt industry-friendly changes to its “resources extraction” disclosure rule follows a 10-year industry fight to water down the measure, mandated by the 2010 Dodd Frank law passed to battle corporate corruption. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am by Bona Law PC
But sometimes competitors choose another path: they avoid competition by banding together to boycott the disruptive new entrant. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 10:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The brief makes another important point: Although Ohio does not endorse Texas's proposed relief, it does endorse its call for a ruling on the meaning of the Electors Clause. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In other words, accepting the principle that state legislatures must set election rules does not lead to the conclusion that one state can sue another for adopting the wrong set of election rules. [read post]