Search for: "AKINS v. PAGE" Results 321 - 340 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2007, 6:25 am
 Our thanks to Andrea Lawrence, Esq., a partner at CTSW, for bringing this case to our attention.To download a copy of the 54-page decision, please use the following link: Harrison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:00 pm by Francis Pileggi
The proposed legislation linked above is a result of the ATP case, styled as ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  Comes now an arbitral panel in the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, or ICSID, and in a 282 page preliminary decision on jurisdiction and admissibility finds that roughly 60,000 Italian bondholders can join together to bring claims against the Republic of Argentina, Abaclat and Others v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Colleen McMahon (below right) of the Southern District of New York stated on page 11 that the court was confrontedwith a legal, not a historical, question.This view is a false dichotomizing of the judicial function.Judges cannot be expected to know intimately the historical context of all cases that come before them. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm by Rick Hills
Larry includes three pages (pages 146-49) on the principle of charity, Quine, and Davidson in Semantic Originalism, but he treats charity as a way of reducing ambiguity through "construction" rather than as a form of "interpretation. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:04 am by Benjamin Wittes
I have now read through Judge Forrest’s opinion in Hedges—all 112 pages of it. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am by Steve Vladeck
Jane already flagged the merits brief filed by the U.S. government on September 17 in al Bahlul v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
  Taking a page from the Sprint Fidelis state court litigation, the court found that because the FDA had specifically approved the design and manufacturing processes at issue, permitting such a claim “is akin to asking a jury to sit in judgment of the FDA’s approval and review process. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am by Eleonora Rosati
The presumption of knowledge established in GS Media would not even have applicability beyond the particular case of linking to unlicensed content (see [113]).Indispensable/essential interventionThirdly, the question of whether the user plays an indispensable/essential role should not be intended as akin to whether the user facilitates access to protected content. [read post]