Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND" Results 321 - 340 of 2,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
” The Supreme Court upheld the federal presidential public funds provision in Buckley v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:59 am by FDABlog HPM
  “The assessment shall address the premarket review process of drugs by [FDA], using an assessment framework that draws from appropriate quality system standards, including management responsibility, documents controls and records management, and corrective and preventive action. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Florida and the plaintiffs will cross-appeal the 11th Circuit ruling to the Supreme Court in the very near future. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
See, e.g., Detailed Comments of Business Roundtable on the Proposed Election Contest Rules and the Proposed Amendment to the Shareholder Proposal Rules 102 (August 17, 2009), ("'state governments and labor unions ... often appear to be driven by concerns other than a desire to increase the economic performance of the companies in which they invest'" (quoting Leo E. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:40 pm by Gordon Firemark
  Supreme Court Denies NCAA Motion to Intervene in First Amendment Case Keller v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
Non-Enforcement Matters New Investment Adviser Rules On June 22, 2011, the SEC adopted certain rules and amendments that implement various federal securities initiatives focusing on investment advisers under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The Appellate Division's ruling leaves intact the lower court's order insofar as it enjoins the defendants from transferring any of FSJ's property, assets, inventory or funds, except as required in the ordinary course of business, and insofar as it declared that the parties' operating agreement remains in full force and effect. [read post]
19 May 2022, 12:02 pm by Doug Cornelius
The case was launched by the SEC in 2011 against a fund manager for overvaluing fund assets to collect more in fees. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
It’s hard for me to wrap my head around the idea that a First Amendment scholar thinks the appellate court ruling was appropriate. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
Their efforts to secure public funding for these schools were universally rejected as "sectarian," and by 1890, 29 states had amended their constitutions to impose some limitation on private school funding.[6]At the same time, American liberalism worked in important ways to the advantage of American Catholics. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:17 am
Court of Appeals in New York to reconsider a unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 10:07 am by Joe Koncelik
” McCarthy goes on to write that “[d]uring the first Bush Administration, EPA tried to ban asbestos under TSCA, but the rule was overturned in court. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:10 pm by pgbarnes
Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 08-205 (2010), holding that corporate funding of “independent” political broadcasts in elections is protected speech under the First Amendment. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:43 am by Socrates & Cassandra
Just to make things a little interesting, I hope some Senators propose: 1) treating these artificial persons as subject to a reinstituted draft for military service, where the CEO would have to serve if the corporation cannot — while the physical criteria for service might have to be waived, such accomplished managers certainly could assist in managing procurements; 2) seeking to expand the size of the Supreme Court to 15 — even if not successful a healthy… [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 3:45 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Second, the Schneiders argued that as to the two LLCs without amended operating agreements, Pine’s management of those Companies to their exclusion ran afoul of their operating agreements’ requirement that “the business and affairs of the Company shall be managed by the members. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm by Amy Howe
That conduct is particularly troubling, CSS suggested, because the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]