Search for: "APPLE V ITC"
Results 321 - 340
of 585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
Just like the "no injunction over FRAND-pledged patents"> part of Judge Richard Posner's Apple v. [read post]
UK judge declines Samsung's job offer, invalidates three 3G standard-essential patents in Apple case
7 Mar 2013, 5:21 am
Most recently a Samsung lawsuit against Apple's voiceover feature (which matters a great deal to blind and vision-impaired users) was stayed.Justice Floyd appears unlikely to follow in Sir Robin Jacob's footsteps and work for Samsung as an expert witness in USITC investigations.The ITC has a deadline later today for a final ruling on Samsung's request for a U.S. import ban against Apple. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:44 am
Judge Posner held in Apple v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 10:06 am
Nokia additionally points to its reliance on InterDigital's promises (a requirement for equitable estoppel) and InterDigital's obligations under the FRAND licensing commitment it made to the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI).In its 12th affirmative defense (waiver) Nokia argues, as Judge Posner did in a famous Apple v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 10:12 pm
It was asserted against Apple through an October 14, 2011 amendment to S3 Graphics' second ITC complaint against Apple, which never came to judgment because of a settlement. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:22 am
InterDigital points to what happened in the Apple v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:45 pm
On that basis, Sir Robin Jacob handled the Samsung v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 10:21 am
Yesterday an HTC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:43 am
The Finnish company is also asserting this patent against its Taiwanese rival in the US (where it is seeking an import ban from the ITC as well as additional remedies, particularly damages, in federal court) and the UK. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:19 am
See Exhibit A (InterDigital Communications Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 1:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
Samsung wants the ITC to ignore Apple's notice of the SO, while Apple says that Samsung should now withdraw its ITC complaint (with respect to SEPs) just like it withdrew its European SEP-based injunction requests last month. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 1:43 am
Since eBay [v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:58 am
This afternoon I attended a Nokia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:50 am
Additional Nokia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 2:35 pm
Samsung presented products that it claimed did not infringe Apple's patents even if the ITC agreed with Apple's infringement arguments (which Samsung also disputed and still disputes). [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
and Cadbury Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:45 am
Simply put, someone who triggers a court action or arbitration to have the FRAND terms set, and is willing to take a license on the final terms, should be on the safe side now.In connection with the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 10:16 am
In early November I already said that the Federal Circuit was going to "receive input from many key stakeholders" concerning Google's (Motorola Mobility's) appeal of the FRAND part of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
