Search for: "AT&T Incorporated" Results 321 - 340 of 17,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm by Steven
Bennett’s application to incorporate his business, claiming it was misleading. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 3:15 pm
It doesn’t make for particularly interesting reading, so I’ll be brief. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:54 am
One can't "feed one can of worms to the trial judge and another to the appellate court. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:30 am by Gene Quinn
Instead, Qualcomm wasn't interested in licensing competing chip makers who wanted to used Qualcomm's technology so they could make their own chips incorporating Qualcomm's patented technology. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
”A similar position is also held by other Boards of appeal, as can be seen from the cited decisions T 382/96 and T 446/00, but also decisions T 1126/97 [3.1.1 et seq.] and T 47/03 [1.1, 1.4 et seq.] as well as T 745/03 [2.2] and T 221/0 [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:46 am by Simon Lester
More generally, I don't expect governments to adopt this approach any time soon, or ever for that matter. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:11 am by Emily Robertson
In English — that means that organizations that that want to change their state of incorporation generally won’t have to file a new application for recognition as a tax exempt organization. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
If a skilled person choses a specific interior rear-view mirror for a car as starting point, he can pursue its development, but the normal outcome of this development will in the end still be a rear-view mirror for a car and not a mirror suitable for use in a damp room (see T 570/91 [4.4]). [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Cook Biotech Incorporated dated 12 June 2009A2 Decision of the Opposition Division in EP 10 774 475.7A3 Decision of the Opposition Division in EP 08 798 550.3A4 Decision of the Opposition Division in EP 15 165 133.8A5 Decision of the Opposition Division in EP 05 777 317.8A6 Decision of the Opposition Division in EP 09 701 993.9A7 Decision of the Opposition Division in EP 06 837 634.2A8 Decision of the Dutch Court of Appeal in case 200.234.115/01IX. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The answer is no, for the features the skilled person would understand to be inessential, as explained in T 331/87 (criticized in T 910/03, but see also T 404/03 [11]). [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:05 am by Jason Potter
I’m suprised to learn the extent to which the federal appeals courts incorporate Wikipedia references into their opinions. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
With more and more law firms understanding public relations and incorporating it to their business development arsenal, it is essential that paralegals, officer managers and attorneys  doing their own media relations and wearing multiple hats DON'T commit the following peeves of journalists! [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:42 am by Kurt Lash
  And if we identify and require states to enforce some kind of “underlying principle,” shouldn’t we also incorporate the Tenth Amendment in a manner that prevents state authorities from violating the underlying principle of that amendment? [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 11:24 pm
" An appellant can't preserve issues without raising them itself, and (equally importantly) doing so "with at least a minimum level of thoroughness. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
T 656/07 has provided a rather surprising exception. [read post]