Search for: "Ali v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
More bad news from Afghanistan: Matthew Rosenberg and Thom Shanker document U.S. concerns that Afghanistan is not yet ready for the United States to withdraw its troops. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
Before responding to particular participants, I should introduce an important intervening precedent – United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
R (Ali) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 25-26 February 2015. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
”) (emphasis added); United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm
Prior to Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
” Here's a seemingly evergreen headline: the United States is urging NATO to play a bigger role in the fight against the Islamic State. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 1:27 am
United States U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 1:50 pm
Obama, Al-Adahi v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
It was this failure of communication and rigid application of the information “wall” that allowed Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi to pass into the United States unhindered and unnoticed; they were both on American Airlines Flight 77 which crashed into the Pentagon. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm
Ali, in which it held, controversially, that a non-citizen contractor in Iraq had insufficient contacts with the United States to support the applicability of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 5:14 pm
The intervention in the Samantar case by the State Department is particularly significant because the United States only occasionally intervenes in litigation, and very rarely intervenes to claim that a defendant is not entitled to immunity. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:00 am
For example, in its response brief in Al Hajj v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 10:24 am
First, in Cincinnati, in ACLU v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 2:19 pm
LAW Joanna Pozen, Note, JUSTICE OBSCURED: THE NON-DISCLOSURE OF WITNESSES' IDENTITIES IN ICTR TRIALS Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 23, Number 6, December 2006 Special Issue: Twenty-Five Years Iran-United States Claims Tribunal Ali Z. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am
The United States also showed its support for Ecuador’s democratic progress with visits by U.S. [read post]
