Search for: "American Electric Company v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
Since those companies were located outside the United States, the US used criminal prosecutions of their executives, who were then arrested as they happened to set foot in the country, often in transit at US airports. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
American Cyanamid Co., 718 P.2d 1318, 1326 (Kan. 1986); Barnes v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 5:56 am
When Corporations Are the Criminalizers Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have promoted private-sector investment in Central America on the theory that it will improve standards of living and stem the flow of migrants to the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The Project is owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and discharges significant quantities of selenium and other pollutants into state and federal wildlife refuges leading into the Delta. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 1:29 pm
Sunbeam resold the Pentalpha deep fryers in the United States under its own trademarks, "Oster" and "Sunbeam. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit) United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch) US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:14 pm
United States (1935), which until recently limited this sort of thing. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:47 pm
Campbell agreed to sponsor his H-1B visa so he could stay in the United States and take the position. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51, 64 (2002) (quoting English); American Insurance Ass'n v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
” In one of the largest consumer class action payouts in American history, Volkswagen agreed to pay up to $14.7 billion in two related settlements—one with the United States and California, and one with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)—arising out of allegations made by the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06 OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14] In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
