Search for: "Any Party in Possession" Results 321 - 340 of 13,548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2013, 12:00 pm by Moderator
As concerns third parties, the presumption of possession means that it is possible for a bona fide third party to validly acquire ownership from a person not legally possessing the shares, if the third party did not have the knowledge of the fact that the seller did not have ownership of the share certificates.By Konstantinos Thomopouloshttp://www.greeklawdigest.gr/component/k2/item/53-share-transfer-deals? [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:59 pm by Carabin & Shaw, P.C.
Any party in a Texas bicycle accident claim or other legal proceeding is required to preserve evidence relevant to that claim. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:42 pm by Michelle O'Neil
Based on the broad and undefined standards of “good cause” and “best interest”, a possession order that gives one party unlimited and complete discretion over the other party’s access to the child is perfectly acceptable. [read post]
14 Dec 2012, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If you have been charged with drug possession, theft or sex crimes, contact them. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:00 am by Tessa Shepperson
Criminal convictions and police complaints If a tenant has been found guilty of a criminal offence which involves behaviour at the property (eg running a brothel) then this should entitle the landlord to a possession order as of right with no discretion for the Judge to entertain any defence. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:55 am
In the case of a stipulated order, the restrained party is still prevented from any and all contact with the protected party and cannot possess a firearm while the stipulated order is in place, but there is no formal finding of domestic violence that would have to be reported later when applying for jobs, a firearms license or immigration procedures. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
A third party in possession of a computer case that had been passed her by the defendant had apparent authority to consent to its search. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 3:58 am by Matt Maurer
In Ontario, parties are required to disclose to the opposing side every document in their power, possession or control that is relevant to the lawsuit. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:47 am by Ramos Law Group, PLLC
It is important to remember that a holiday period of possession, including Spring Break, supersedes any regularly scheduled period of possession. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, U.S. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:22 pm by V.D.RAO
Again, as there can not be any procedural defect normally with the order passed by the Magistrate Court under section 14, how can the DRT set-aside that order or can the DRT say that the physical possession can not be taken or possession be restored? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:47 pm by Guest & Gray
This means that once removed, the other party will not have any access to the children until the hearing. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:08 pm by Daniel Richardson
 It also contained the following provision: If at any time while Husband is alive, he sells any or all of his stock in [ABI] . . . [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:09 pm by Katherine Gallo
(3)       The statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:09 pm by Katherine Gallo
(3)       The statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:09 pm by Katherine Gallo
(3)       The statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:00 am by Rory Little
But then, after two months of silence, the Justices set the case for re-argument and directed the parties to brief the “unconstitutionally vague” question. [read post]
To prevail on a claim for adverse possession, a party must show hostile, open, exclusive, and continuous possession of that property under claim of right or color of title for a period of at least 10 years. [read post]