Search for: "Any and All Unknown Claimants of Interest"
Results 321 - 340
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably will not grant an… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
Of course, it will add something to the substance and newsworthiness of the story that the police are investigating the claimant, but it seems to me that it would be tipping the scales too far in favour of the media to hold that not only the name of the claimant, but the details of the allegations against him, can normally be published as part of a story free of any right in the claimant to sue for defamation just because the general subject matter of the story is… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
If Phillipson’s additional argument were correct, any question of whether privacy rights are outweighed in the ultimate balance by the public interest in the exercise of expression rights by the media would not arise. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
In this feature we revisit some older posts which are still of current interest. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
No prior notice had been given to any interested media organisations and the judge felt the application was more an attempt to protect Terry’s reputation and the financial interests of his commercial sponsors than to protect privacy. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
It all depends on the circumstances (Ibid, paras 55 and 56). [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
We are sure that Mr Singh has not forgotten that “large corporations” have vested interests on both sides of the debate and that any reform needs to balance the rights of both claimants and defendants. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 12:00 am
Craig Vander Zee: It’s an interesting topic and certainly deserves more attention than just, you know, what we can cover in one podcast. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm
It doesn't take a genius to find out we didn't have any stock, certainly not enough stock to cover 220 [million] shares. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 4:31 am
Any residual goes to local public schools. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
” The dissenters found this unambiguously excluding coverage for all insureds if any of them acted intentionally. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
I think they are to be interpreted with reference to subsection (5) so as to mean “could not have been ascertained had the claimant made all reasonable efforts, having regard to the claimant’s position, to discover them”. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:22 am
In any event, sometimes the ALJ will make an offer to find a claimant disabled, but the back benefits due to you will be calculated from a later date. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:56 am
Indeed, press reports (here) relating to the lawsuit expressly noted that "unlike other Madoff-related cases, the suit does not contain a securities claim, meaning plaintiffs can receive relevant information about the case before any trial that could bring to light previously unknown details on the case. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
This practice would never have been permitted at all if it had not been for a concerted effort by the banking lobby in the 1980s and early 1990s. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 6:40 pm
This notice contained the date and time of the accident, and identified that the daughter had been a passenger in the taxi which was driven by an unknown white male, and that the taxi had been "struck by a motor vehicle operated by an unknown female. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:15 pm
This is central to a proper consideration of all the matters now before the court.14. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
[Interesting, Andrews do or until very recently did legal aid!] [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:18 pm
There are some "non-standard" auto insurance companies that seldom have to pay UM claims since they only write 25K minimum limits policies, and their UM coverages are always canceled out by the liability coverage of any tortfeasor who has any insurance at all. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 10:07 am
If the names, residence or quantity of interest of any owner or claimant is unknown to plaintiff, this shall be stated. [read post]
